Skip to main content

Book Review - "Guns, Germs, and Steel" – A Personal Review and Reflection


Some books change how you see a specific issue. This one changed how I see history itself. Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel isn’t just a history book — it’s a massive, ambitious attempt to answer one of the most controversial questions in human history: Why did some societies conquer and dominate others? And he doesn’t settle for easy answers like intelligence or culture. Instead, he goes to the roots — geography, biology, and environment.

From the very start, Diamond lays out the challenge: Why did Europeans end up with the “guns, germs, and steel” that allowed them to colonize large parts of the world, while other civilizations didn’t? He’s not interested in blaming anyone or elevating one group over another — his goal is to strip away racial or cultural bias and explain history through science.

What struck me most is how he emphasizes geography as the real game-changer. Eurasia, for example, had plants and animals that could be domesticated, a climate that supported food surpluses, and an east-west axis that made it easier for innovations to spread. Africa, the Americas, and other regions didn’t have the same advantages — not because the people were less capable, but because the natural resources they had access to were different.

And then there’s the power of germs. Europeans had lived for centuries in close proximity to animals, developing resistance to diseases like smallpox. When they arrived in the Americas, it wasn’t just weapons that gave them an advantage — it was the unintentional biological warfare of disease. That part of the book hit me hard. It’s a brutal but necessary reminder of how unintentional forces can reshape civilizations.

What I appreciated is how Diamond backs everything with evidence from anthropology, biology, linguistics, and archaeology. This isn’t speculative storytelling — it’s a rigorous scientific effort to understand deep patterns of development over 13,000 years. Yet despite all the detail, the writing remains accessible and often gripping.

Now, Guns, Germs, and Steel isn’t without criticism. Some scholars say Diamond downplays the role of culture, politics, or contingency — the unpredictable stuff. And fair enough. But to me, his core insight remains valuable: the fates of societies were shaped more by environment than by essence. It’s humbling, really — it reminds us how much of our so-called “superiority” is circumstantial.

Reading this book made me rethink historical narratives I’d taken for granted. It made me more aware of the hidden structures behind global inequality. And most importantly, it made me curious — not just about history, but about how we use power, how we justify it, and how much of it is built on things we never chose.

So if you’re looking for a book that connects history with science, and that challenges you to look at the past through a wider, more objective lens — this one will do exactly that. It’s not comforting, and it’s not always easy. But it’s honest. And sometimes, that’s exactly what history needs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review - "A History of Western Philosophy" – A Personal Review and Reflection

Reading Bertrand Russell’s A History of Western Philosophy felt like stepping into the grand, winding corridors of Western thought — with Russell himself as your witty, insightful, and occasionally snarky guide. I didn’t open this book expecting to agree with everything. What I wanted was clarity, structure, and a sense of how all these big thinkers across the centuries connect. And that’s exactly what this book delivered, with a tone that balances intellect and irreverence brilliantly. Russell doesn’t just list philosophers. He sketches their ideas, yes, but also their lives, their contradictions, their blind spots. From the ancient Greeks to the modern rationalists, he doesn’t hesitate to praise where it's due, but he also critiques with surgical precision. He brings Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Hume, Kant, Nietzsche — and so many more — into sharp, readable focus. What makes this book stand out to me is that Russell writes as both a philosopher and a histor...

How does JWT Authorization works

When a user logs into the application, they provide their username and password to the backend. The backend verifies these credentials and, if they are valid, generates a JSON Web Token (JWT) containing information such as the user's ID and roles. This JWT is signed with a secret key unique to the server and sent back to the client. The client securely stores the JWT, commonly in browser storage or as an HTTP-only cookie. When the user attempts to access protected resources or perform specific tasks, the client sends the JWT with the request to the backend. The backend then verifies the integrity of the token by checking its signature. If the signature is valid, the backend extracts the user information from the JWT payload and processes the request accordingly, ensuring that the user has the necessary permissions based on their roles and authorization level. Additionally, JWTs often have an expiration time, after which the token becomes invalid, prompting the user to re-authentica...

Book Review - "The Selfish Gene" – A Personal Review and Reflection

Some books explain things. Others  reframe  how you understand reality. Richard Dawkins’  The Selfish Gene  definitely falls into the second category. I went in expecting a book about biology — what I got was a radical shift in how I think about life, evolution, and even human behavior. Right from the opening, Dawkins does something bold: he asks us to stop thinking of evolution as being about individuals or species, and to focus instead on genes. Genes, he argues, are the real players in evolution — long-lasting replicators, using bodies as temporary vehicles to get themselves copied. This shift from the organism to the gene as the central unit of natural selection is what makes the book so groundbreaking. Now, the term “selfish” isn’t meant morally — it’s metaphorical. Genes aren’t conscious or evil. But they “behave,” in an evolutionary sense, as if they’re selfish — doing whatever increases their chances of being passed on. That means creating organisms that are ...