Skip to main content

Book Review - "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" – A Personal Review and Reflection


So, Thus Spoke Zarathustra... where do I even begin? Honestly, this isn't just a book — it's a philosophical storm, a poetic manifesto, and at times, a riddle that bites its own tail. When I picked it up, I knew Nietzsche was going to challenge me — but I didn’t know how deeply it would reshape the way I look at morality, religion, power, and even personal growth.

The book follows Zarathustra — a sage-like figure inspired by the historical Zoroaster — who descends from his solitude in the mountains to share his wisdom with humanity. But instead of being welcomed like some divine messenger, he's misunderstood, rejected, and often ridiculed. And that, right there, is symbolic. Nietzsche’s entire philosophy often falls on deaf ears — not because it's flawed, but because it's confronting.

Now, Nietzsche doesn’t write like your typical philosopher. He writes like a poet on fire. The language is dense, symbolic, and highly lyrical. You can’t just read this book — you have to wrestle with it. You sit with a paragraph and think, “What the hell did I just read?” And then, a day later, it hits you like a revelation. That’s the kind of experience Nietzsche crafts.

One of the central concepts in the book is the idea of the Übermensch, or “Overman” — not a superior race or superhero, as it's often misunderstood, but rather an evolved version of humanity. Someone who creates their own values instead of inheriting them blindly from religion, culture, or tradition. Nietzsche is essentially saying: “You want meaning? Then don’t look up. Don’t look back. Look within, and then beyond what you are.”

This ties into his famous declaration: “God is dead.” A lot of people get that wrong. Nietzsche isn’t celebrating atheism in a smug way. He’s mourning — mourning the collapse of a shared moral framework. But he’s also issuing a challenge: if God is dead, then who or what will replace Him? How do we live meaningfully without falling into nihilism? And that's where the Übermensch steps in — not as a savior, but as a solution.

What also stood out to me was Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence — the idea that you must live your life in such a way that you'd willingly repeat it infinitely. It's haunting, honestly. It’s like being asked: If you had to live this exact life over and over forever, would you be proud? Or would you be terrified? It forces you to take radical ownership of your choices. There’s no hiding behind fate or excuses.

Now, let me be real: this book isn't easy. There were times I was frustrated. It can feel cryptic, repetitive, or even arrogant. But I also think that’s intentional. Nietzsche doesn’t hand-feed you ideas — he throws you into the wilderness and says, “Find your way.” That discomfort is part of the transformation. It reflects Zarathustra’s own journey of preaching, doubting, retreating, evolving.

And speaking of Zarathustra, I don’t see him just as a character. I see him as Nietzsche’s mirror — a mythic figure used to express Nietzsche’s inner conflict: the tension between being a solitary thinker and a teacher trying to reach others. It’s like Nietzsche is both warning us and inviting us — he’s bitter about humanity’s resistance to growth, but he still hasn’t given up on us.

In the end, Thus Spoke Zarathustra isn’t just a philosophical treatise — it’s a test. Of your patience, your convictions, and your openness to rethinking everything you thought you knew. It asks a simple but dangerous question: “Are you brave enough to create your own values?” Because if you are, then maybe — just maybe — you’re ready to become the Overman.

I won’t pretend I understand every line of it. I don’t think anyone truly does. But that’s what makes it beautiful. It’s not meant to be understood in one go — it’s meant to grow with you, to provoke you again and again as you evolve. It's not a closed book — it's a living challenge.

And for that, I’m grateful. Because after reading Zarathustra, I don’t just think differently — it made me a different person.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review - "A History of Western Philosophy" – A Personal Review and Reflection

Reading Bertrand Russell’s A History of Western Philosophy felt like stepping into the grand, winding corridors of Western thought — with Russell himself as your witty, insightful, and occasionally snarky guide. I didn’t open this book expecting to agree with everything. What I wanted was clarity, structure, and a sense of how all these big thinkers across the centuries connect. And that’s exactly what this book delivered, with a tone that balances intellect and irreverence brilliantly. Russell doesn’t just list philosophers. He sketches their ideas, yes, but also their lives, their contradictions, their blind spots. From the ancient Greeks to the modern rationalists, he doesn’t hesitate to praise where it's due, but he also critiques with surgical precision. He brings Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Hume, Kant, Nietzsche — and so many more — into sharp, readable focus. What makes this book stand out to me is that Russell writes as both a philosopher and a histor...

Book Review - "The Selfish Gene" – A Personal Review and Reflection

Some books explain things. Others  reframe  how you understand reality. Richard Dawkins’  The Selfish Gene  definitely falls into the second category. I went in expecting a book about biology — what I got was a radical shift in how I think about life, evolution, and even human behavior. Right from the opening, Dawkins does something bold: he asks us to stop thinking of evolution as being about individuals or species, and to focus instead on genes. Genes, he argues, are the real players in evolution — long-lasting replicators, using bodies as temporary vehicles to get themselves copied. This shift from the organism to the gene as the central unit of natural selection is what makes the book so groundbreaking. Now, the term “selfish” isn’t meant morally — it’s metaphorical. Genes aren’t conscious or evil. But they “behave,” in an evolutionary sense, as if they’re selfish — doing whatever increases their chances of being passed on. That means creating organisms that are ...

Book Review - "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" – A Personal Review and Reflection

Reading Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari felt like zooming way, way out from my daily life and looking at the human story from the edge of the galaxy. It’s ambitious, thought-provoking, and at times, deeply unsettling — in the best way possible. It made me question the narratives I’ve lived by, the institutions I trust, and the assumptions I didn’t even know I was carrying. The book covers an enormous timeline, from the cognitive revolution about 70,000 years ago to the present digital age. But Harari doesn’t just recount facts — he interprets them. He explores how Homo sapiens became the dominant species not because we were the strongest, but because we could cooperate in large groups based on shared myths — religion, money, nations, human rights. That insight alone made me stop and reevaluate how powerful stories really are in shaping our world. One of the most fascinating ideas in the book is that our success came not just from intelligence, but from our ability to believe in fiction...